document is also addressed to the courts. This is a 
     further delegation, and a delegation of a different 
     authority, to decide, not what the word means, but 
     whether the immediate addressee had authority to make 
     them mean what he did make them mean, or what he 
     proposes to make them mean. In other words, the 
     question before the court is not whether he gave the 
     words the right meaning, but whether or not the words 
     authorized the meaning he gave them. (55)

     What Curtis so correctly discerns in the nature of applied 
terminology, equally concerns populations, civil and military. 
Unless processed in a uniform way, it would be quite impossible 
to have delegation of functions and duties, and thus there 
could be no centralized national groupings such as came into 
existence after printing. Without similar uniform processing by